| A Courtesy of Healing Touch Chiropractic and Dr. Gary L. Easter Canadian Drugs: Hazardous to your health or to Drug Company Profits? The news recently has been filled with articles about the cheap price of drugs in Canada (as well as many other foreign countries). It seems that America, the world's largest consumer of prescription drugs, pays more for those drugs than any other country in the world. Canada's drugs are so cheap and easy to get that New Hampshire, Boston and now Illinois has opted to defy the government and purchase their drugs for their state employee and other state health systems from Canada, saving their strapped legislatures millions of dollars. Just how much profit are we talking about here for 361 new drugs “based on new chemicals acting in new ways”? According to an article in the October 2002 issue of Life Extension Magazine, the cost of the generic ingredients in 100 tablets of Celebrex is .60 cents. The consumer price for those same 100 tablets is $130.27 which is a markup of 21,712% for a total of 361 new drugs, and that is just one example. The markup on Claritin was 30,306% markup. That's a lot of profit for just 361 new drugs. The reasoning behind the FDA's decision to oppose some states getting their drugs from Canada is that they can not guarantee the quality and safety of those drugs. Recently, several members of Congress accused the FDA of trying to “scare” older Americans from buying drugs from Canada. Under questioning, Associate Commissioner for the FDA William Hubbard admitted he could not say that Canada regulates prescription drugs any less rigorously than the United States. He also said he knew of no cases of Americans yet being harmed by drugs from Canada. So why is the FDA against cheaper drugs from Canada? One possible reason is conflicts of interest. USA TODAY analyzed financial conflicts of interest on the 18 expert advisory committees established by the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. These committees vote on whether new drugs should be approved and what regulations should govern the drug approval process. The newspaper created a database of financial conflicts disclosed at all 159 advisory committee meetings from Jan. 1, 1998, through June 30, 2000. About 250 members appeared 1,620 times during those meetings. As required by law, FDA advisory committees disclose when members have a financial interest in the subject of the meeting. Financial interest is defined in FDA regulations "as the potential for gain or loss as a result of government action on a particular matter." More than half of the experts hired to advise the government on the safety and effectiveness of medicine have financial relationships with the pharmaceutical companies that will be helped or hurt by their decisions, a USA TODAY study found. Click Here for more info. |